Welcome to De-Commissioned, a place for former members of the Great Commission movement (aka GCM, GCC, GCAC, GCI, the Blitz) to discuss problems they've experienced in the association's practices and theology.

You may read and post, but some features are restricted to registered members. Please consider registering to gain full access! Registration is free and only takes a few moments to complete.
De-Commissioned Forum
June 01, 2025, 09:04:04 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Personal Life? What's that?  (Read 40841 times)
namaste
Veteran (100-299 Posts)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 201



« Reply #40 on: September 19, 2007, 05:28:17 pm »

Well, I'm not embarassed.

I have sex often.  And loudly.  I never thought to consider which one of us initiates....

Sorry, maybe I'm just incapable of shame, but if someone's going to be ridiculous enough to ask a question like that, then I look forward to watching them turn beet-faced when I answer. Wink

If someone were obnoxious enough to actually ask that, I'd probably ask if they wanted details and positions, too.  :twisted:

Are you starting to see why I didn't do so well in our local GC-affiliate?  :oops:
Logged

Om, shanti.
puff of purple smoke
Administrator
Household Name (300+ Posts)
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 604



« Reply #41 on: September 19, 2007, 06:17:47 pm »

Quote
So, we all gathered together and the first question was, "What is your wife's favorite ice cream flavor?' No problem. Next question, "When it comes to sex, who initiates?"


LOL. And the sad thing is, I immediately pieced together the GC-logic behind asking such a question. A women is not supposed to initiate ANYTHING, so why would sex be any different? Am I correct? Was that why they asked? Smiley

Totally creepy whatever the reason.
Logged
namaste
Veteran (100-299 Posts)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 201



« Reply #42 on: September 19, 2007, 06:18:50 pm »

Puff-
Maybe the guy or girl doing the asking is just envious. Wink
Logged

Om, shanti.
AgathaL'Orange
Household Name (300+ Posts)
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1182



« Reply #43 on: September 19, 2007, 07:44:33 pm »

Quote
A women is not supposed to initiate ANYTHING, so why would sex be any different? Am I correct? Was that why they asked?


Well, obviously Linda will have to answer the "why" in this particular case.  However, I can say that MY take on this issue within GCM is that they actually would encourage women to initiate.  In fact, there is a talk by a woman given... it was pretty recent at a couple's conference where they encourage women to do this.  Remember women are around to support their husbands... this is yet another way to do that.  Trust me... not too mention that it was pretty much assumed that a husband had an insatiable appetite for sex and that a woman was supposed to submit to this.
Logged

Glad to be free.
Linda
Household Name (300+ Posts)
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2528



« Reply #44 on: September 19, 2007, 08:55:38 pm »

Wow, we head out to Panera for a little supper and when we come home things have gotten lively here! Ha!

Actually, I don't think there was an agenda. The game was purchased (can't remember the name of it) and it (as far as I know) was just a luck of the draw that the men picked the ice cream question card, followed by the sex card. (I suppose the leaders could have stacked the deck, but highly doubt it).

Anyway, we did discuss this over a bowl of soup at Panera tonight and what struck me was Agatha's comment:

Quote
I too remember extremely inappropriate things that I wish I would have walked out on. But I am a non-confrontational person, and I didn't want to be rude. However, I should have spoken up.


I really relate to this. I remember at the time thinking that we were well into our 40's at the time and the apprentices were mid-30's so I figured it was just an age thing where I had a different sense of modesty and appropriate topics for public discussions than they did. Plus, we were guests at their home, and didn't want to rebuke them in front of the entire group, so we didn't speak up. Terry's answer to the question, by the way was, "Linda will not answer this question."

Knowing what we know now, we both would have said something like, "Hey, you guys, this is not a topic that should be discussed publicly, let's pick a different question."

But, as Agatha mentioned, we didn't want to be rude and, frankly, were blindsided by the question.

Also, for 10 years we really were quite non-confrontational. In fact, it took the sermon where Mark Darling told us that we were his bride to get us to chat with a pastor about the theological inaccuracies of that statement and it's implications. It took Terry 10 months after we left to post his infamous blog post (which he did because people had apparently been told we left because we didn't like the changes in youth ministry and he wanted to set the record straight). We don't like to confront, but have learned that sometimes it's the right thing to do.

I think of so many times where I really tried to be a team player and gave a pass to things that should have been nipped in the bud.

Especially troubling about that small group meeting was that it was the first meeting after a big showdown about small groups. Being in an official ECC small group was a requirement to participate in the worship ministry. So, for Terry to play the guitar, we had to be in a small group. One couple (an excellent singer whose husband was an excellent guitar player, both had been in small groups for years) had wanted to attend a non-ECC Bible study for a few months and asked for permission to do that instead of participate in an official ECC Small Group. They were told that a different Bible study didn't count, if they weren't in an official ECC small group, they couldn't be involved in the worship ministry. They left the church.

This was the first small group meeting we attended after that showdown and while the couple mentioned wasn't in our particular group, I remember thinking, what a waste to require people to attend a group if awkward, personal questions and nothing particularly spiritual is all that is happening.

Namaste, I don't think it's an issue of being embarrassed (your comment made me laugh, though, I wish you would have been in our small group that day!), for me it is an issue of appropriateness and privacy. Couples should not be sharing the intimate details of their marriage publicly. Also, in small groups, there should be respect for all attending. Some people are more earthy and some more modest, all should be respected. All I'm saying is that no one should be forced to either answer questions like that or hear the answers to questions like that.

And, Agatha, I think I listened to the talk you are referring to here:

Quote
In fact, there is a talk by a woman given... it was pretty recent at a couple's conference where they encourage women to do this.


I am so glad we never went to a marriage conference!
Logged

Thanks be unto God for his unspeakable gift.
namaste
Veteran (100-299 Posts)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 201



« Reply #45 on: September 19, 2007, 09:52:58 pm »

Linda-
I totally understand what you're saying and agree with you.

In fact, many reputable people agree with you.  When my husband and I got married (in the church I grew up in), our GC pastor co-led the ceremony with the pastor at my "home church."  My friends and family were uniformly appauled by this guy's message.

The pastor who did our premarital counseling commented that we had some truly screwed up ideas about submission, and marital roles in general.
Logged

Om, shanti.
The Clone
Regular (15-99 Posts)
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49



« Reply #46 on: September 20, 2007, 11:22:10 am »

I have NEVER recognized Mark Darling as an Elder.  I walked out on his recognition.  I have counseled with him before about a job situation, and as one person to another he was very encouraging.  I think he is prejudice and uses the Bible to justify it.  I think he uses the pulpit to try to control people with shame.  Two examples: One time there was a special meeting about the mission of the church.  He ranted about how it was sin that we didn’t volunteer any more than we did.  He especially put the pressure on the singles because we don’t have children; there we’re supposed to have all this extra time on our hands that we are sinfully wasting our time.  It was more his attitude and presentation.  You went out of there, not motivated and encouraged, but with your tail between your legs feeling like you could never make the grade.  Another incident: During one of his sermons he was going off on people who struggle with obesity.  He was saying how that was just sin and they should repent and stop eating so much and display some self control.  He was offensive and insensitive. I don’t want to follow, support, or be involved with a man, or woman, like that.  You know, since I left, no one has contacted me but you.  Isn’t that interesting?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.1.1