Are you saying that most ECC folks are thinking that Natalie just misinterpreted normal counseling practices? Even though Mark's representatives (mostly his children) are saying that he NEVER did these things (counseled a woman alone, met in the woods with a woman)? How do they reconcile those contradictory claims?
Thanks for clarifying. The "insider" ECC perspective on what Natalie shared on Fox9 boils down to "a walk or two in the woods as a more pleasant place for some light counseling than an office that was clearly misunderstood"..I have heard there is more to the story than that, but that is the "spin" and in the absence of other facts, it's hard to counter. All that really (should) matter is what was shared with Joan, but I doubt we'll hear that.
I've been thinking this would be a good option for victims depending on what the BOT announces.
This is all about the victims so nothing should be shared they don't want shared - but to the degree they are willing to share it would be helpful to know how many victims actually spoke with Joan, any outlines of stories that have not yet been shared to refute the "it was just a hug narrative." Knowledge is power and right now, as an ECC location member, we are relatively powerless (even to know who is on our BOT making these decisions, which is another topic). Just my thoughts, and again no victim should be pressured to share anything she doesn't want to - at all.
