Welcome to De-Commissioned, a place for former members of the Great Commission movement (aka GCM, GCC, GCAC, GCI, the Blitz) to discuss problems they've experienced in the association's practices and theology.

You may read and post, but some features are restricted to registered members. Please consider registering to gain full access! Registration is free and only takes a few moments to complete.
De-Commissioned Forum
June 01, 2025, 12:50:54 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Why Did GC Constantly Change It's Name?  (Read 5377 times)
Ned_Flanders
Veteran (100-299 Posts)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130



« on: February 24, 2013, 08:41:14 am »

Perhaps this has been discussed before but why was GC constantly changing its name and re-inventing itself?  The front page of this forum site shows several different names:

•The "Blitz" Movement (1970-1983)
•Great Commission International (1983-1989)
•Great Commission Ministries (1989-Present)
•Great Commission Association of Churches (1989-Present)
•Great Commission Churches (2005-Present)

This occurred at the ground level, too.  While I was involved in GCx (for 8 years), there was this constant change from home groups to small groups to life groups to cel groups to ministry groups, and so on.  I went to two different GCx Churches in two different states and I remember the first one talking about a name change.  The second one changed its name after I left.  I've been involved in a number of churches and I don't think I've ever seen one change as much as this organization did.  Anyone know why?  
« Last Edit: February 24, 2013, 08:48:42 am by Ned_Flanders » Logged
FeministRebel
Veteran (100-299 Posts)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 111



« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2013, 05:26:44 pm »

I don't know of a real reason, but I do think it might have to do with some of their reputation issues in the past. In 2003, I worked for this woman (for 6 months) who she, and her husband, ran this business and they seemed to always be changing their name, running away from bad publicity, the people they had wronged by not giving them products they had ordered (and taken their money anyway), etc. I think it might be a similar thing...

Of course, nowadays, one can google and find all kinds of info on GCx; but when I was at GCx, there was no such thing... and I would have never known who they had been by their new names. If they get a new name, and it's not yet on those Wiki pages, or whatever else, they can sort of avoid newer people finding out some things... *shrug*
Logged
Ned_Flanders
Veteran (100-299 Posts)
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130



« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2013, 07:35:29 pm »

I don't know of a real reason, but I do think it might have to do with some of their reputation issues in the past. In 2003, I worked for this woman (for 6 months) who she, and her husband, ran this business and they seemed to always be changing their name, running away from bad publicity, the people they had wronged by not giving them products they had ordered (and taken their money anyway), etc. I think it might be a similar thing...

My gut tells me this is what it was about, but I don't know.  Maybe they felt like they had to constantly re-invent themselves to stay fresh.  In any case, I've never seen one place constantly make so many adminstrative changes as GCx did. 
Logged
ISU Alumna
Regular (15-99 Posts)
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 46



« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2013, 03:14:18 am »

Ned, my feeling is that the name changes are just an outer sign of what was going on at a much deeper level, all along. The people running the show were always pulling smoke-and-mirrors stunts to disguise their true motives -- and not just towards the outer world, but towards all of us ignorant second-class saints as well.

I was involved with the church in Ames during the time that you designate as "the Blitz." But do you know what? Not once did I hear anyone use that term, ever. I first learned about it decades later, here on the internet. Back then, we had large-group meetings, and home-group meetings, and Task Force teams, and musical groups... which all went under the umbrella term "ISU Bible Studies," because that allowed us to use campus facilities. But among ourselves, we referred to our group simply as "the body" or "the saints in "Ames" (as distinguished from "the saints in Lawrence" or wherever). We had no real name at all, although we used countless names for our various activities.

Further, there were secret groups, such as THEOS, which we were told we should never mention to outsiders, since it was Jim's cover for his publishing enterprises.... But now that I look back on it, I can see that by admonishing us to keep things hush-hush, the leaders were also effectively preventing us from asking any questions.  Sad

Jim and his small cohort of fellow schemers liked to keep things fluid within the church. We were constantly being organized into new teams with confusing new assignments. They kept us too busy to ask questions about who was making these decisions, and why. Each grand new plan was simply presented to us as a fait accompli, and we did our best to keep up. Sadly, I didn't do such a good job of keeping up. I grew quite ill from the strain; and when the M.D. recommended certain medications, my team leaders promptly sent me to a private meeting with an elder, whose counsel mainly boiled down to: "Nobody but us knows what's best for you."

But who were they -- these people who claimed to know the will of God? They never said. They never identified themselves, to us or to anyone else. They never told us that Jim had founded the church. (He was out of town a lot.) They never told us that he claimed to be an apostle. They never told us about his background in the Plymouth Brethren.... They just told us what we were supposed to do.

What it boils down to is this:

These proclaimers of faith did not have enough faith to trust their own church members with the truth about what they were doing. So how could they possibly be truthful with outsiders?
Logged

And even though it all went wrong,
I'll stand before the Lord of Song
With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah.
  --  Leonard Cohen
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.1.1