Is there a site that talks about the problems with their doctrines? I remember when many people left the church after the elders talked about how God is not omniscient -- He limits his knowledge because of man's free will -- this was not that long ago. And there was the time when Christians didn't have a sin nature because of a book that an Elder read. (that was in the 80's) Then there was the head coverings -- also a popular topic in the 80's.
Talk about being swept here and there by every wind of doctrine!!
There is no site that expresses their doctrines because the leaders are each so independent to the point of having no coherent doctrine among them.
I remember a message by Dave Bovenmeyer talking about learning what justification meant as a doctrine. This was years after his recognition as an elder and a national leader.
Without a systematic study of theology, an elder could be recognized with serious serious serious shortcomings in knowing anything about orthodox doctrine. His character is supposed to be the measure of his understanding of doctrine. His willingness to be led and to lead in the same fashion is the measure of his maturity.
I've said it before, most of these assemblies operate on the Situational Theology method. The theology/teaching depends on the current situation. The scripture can stay the same but the meaning changes each time.
Lone...that's one of the things I honestly appreciate about you: that you look into things like that: I've found the same hardship in trying to honestly evaluate in order to not mis-characterize...and found that the way you do that is read the books they do at the time, and pin-down the sources of quirks/character/methodology/philosophies/whatever GC and its churches are doing...quite serious when it all often conflicts with scripture. : (
Oh, and don't harp on the headcovering people...technically even theologian admit you can't argue against them from scripture: even in trying to say "cultural" since that's not what Paul appeals to; however it would be much more respectful and responsible to actually be studied and able to present things coherently rather than just leading astray as you're lead astray; I'm just a young guy and I can already talk about those things (even uncomfortable ones like headcoverings) semi-coherently and with understanding of the historical/theological/doctrinal from the text--and trust me I'm not ag-ed man qualified to be an elder: so it's frustrating to watch these men demand obedience when they don't know what the heck they're talking about...at all...except that they have a bit of life-experience and they draw from that rather than scripture (or, again, from whatever book they're reading at the time). : (