This was posted in another thread:
Who knows, maybe when the board gets the results from the independent investigation they may decide its to volatile to make a decision,and hand it over to a lawyer in a defamation lawsuit. Either way the investigation goes it would be plausible, as the Church and many of the members would have good cause from many here, and on social media, that have been doing a lot of defamation. Might want to keep that in mind when throwing people’s names around and making accusations about them, as I see on Suzanne FB... Lawsuits occur at the drop of a hat these days.
My thoughts?
More intimidation from an ECC member. A few of you seem to want nothing more than to shut this forum up, or down, any way you can.
If the report shows Mark to have been an abuser, rest assured that it will be subpoenaed by the defendants if ECC is foolish enough to try to take them to court. You can't claim defamation if it can be shown that you really did what you're accused of doing.
Given all the remarks made by the Darling children and their supporters about Suzanne's mental state, her morals, her financial problems, and her suggested-but-never-proven-probably-nonexistent criminal record, it seems to me that Suzanne would be the one with grounds to claim defamation. And some of her critics have been unwise enough to make their accusations under their own real names.
GCx in general is into cover-ups. Court cases bring things to light.